Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://rollenspiel.social/users/ArneBab/statuses/113441799832614658">Arne Babenhauserheide (arnebab@rollenspiel.social)'s status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 22:01:37 JST</a><a href="https://rollenspiel.social/@ArneBab" title="arnebab@rollenspiel.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/8121-48-20230128222518.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Arne Babenhauserheide" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Arne Babenhauserheide</a><div><a href="https://rollenspiel.social/@ArneBab/113441739413372630" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://hostsharing.coop/@dzu">@dzu</a> I have a first productive takeaway from our discussion here: I realized that in my article <a href="https://www.draketo.de/english/science/quality-assurance" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.draketo.de/english/science/quality-assurance</a> I had also generalized too much, so I just added a footnote:<br><a href="https://www.draketo.de/english/science/quality-assurance#fn:integrity" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.draketo.de/english/science/quality-assurance#fn:integrity</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3916479#notice-7728026">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-11-07T22:01:37+09:00" title="Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 22:01:37 JST">about 3 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://rollenspiel.social/@ArneBab/113441799832614658" rel="external" title="Sent from rollenspiel.social via ActivityPub">rollenspiel.social</a></span></span><a href="https://rollenspiel.social/@ArneBab/113441799832614658">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.draketo.de</div><h5><a href="https://www.draketo.de/english/science/quality-assurance">counting scientific publications as metric for scientific quality is dumb | Zwillingssterns Weltenwald | 1w6</a></h5><div> from <span>Arne Babenhauserheide</span></div></header><div>So, 11/19/2017 - 11:35 — Draketo Scientific institutions1 currently base a large part of their internal evaluation, their comparison to others, and their hiring decisions on counting publication (with a number of different scorings). And this is dumb. On the surface this causes pressure to publish as many papers as possible2 which drives down quality of publications... 1w6</div><footer></footer></article></li><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/3433030">screenshot of the linked footnote:That said: While I did my PhD and postdoc in atmospheric physics (up until 2017), I worked with many scientists from several different countries, and every single one of them lived the idealism of scientific integrity and put it before the harmful incentives. So while some of the incentives over the past decades are a problem, they do not at present destroy the reliability of science in general. ↩</a></label><br><a href="https://rollenspiel.social/system/media_attachments/files/113/441/798/504/224/079/original/73ba5086fb9084b3.png" rel="external">https://rollenspiel.social/system/media_attachments/files/113/441/798/504/224/079/original/73ba5086fb9084b3.png</a></li><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.draketo.de</div><h5><a href="https://www.draketo.de/english/science/quality-assurance#fn:integrity">counting scientific publications as metric for scientific quality is dumb | Zwillingssterns Weltenwald | 1w6</a></h5><div> from <span>Arne Babenhauserheide</span></div></header><div>So, 11/19/2017 - 11:35 — Draketo Scientific institutions1 currently base a large part of their internal evaluation, their comparison to others, and their hiring decisions on counting publication (with a number of different scorings). And this is dumb. On the surface this causes pressure to publish as many papers as possible2 which drives down quality of publications... 1w6</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Arne Babenhauserheide (arnebab@rollenspiel.social)'s status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 22:01:37 JSTArne Babenhauserheide
in reply to
- Detlev Zundel
@dzu I have a first productive takeaway from our discussion here: I realized that in my article https://www.draketo.de/english/science/quality-assurance I had also generalized too much, so I just added a footnote:
https://www.draketo.de/english/science/quality-assurance#fn:integrity
In conversationabout 3 months ago from rollenspiel.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.draketo.de
  counting scientific publications as metric for scientific quality is dumb | Zwillingssterns Weltenwald | 1w6
  from Arne Babenhauserheide
  So, 11/19/2017 - 11:35 — Draketo Scientific institutions1 currently base a large part of their internal evaluation, their comparison to others, and their hiring decisions on counting publication (with a number of different scorings). And this is dumb. On the surface this causes pressure to publish as many papers as possible2 which drives down quality of publications... 1w6
2. screenshot of the linked footnote: That said: While I did my PhD and postdoc in atmospheric physics (up until 2017), I worked with many scientists from several different countries, and every single one of them lived the idealism of scientific integrity and put it before the harmful incentives. So while some of the incentives over the past decades are a problem, they do not at present destroy the reliability of science in general. ↩
  https://rollenspiel.social/system/media_attachments/files/113/441/798/504/224/079/original/73ba5086fb9084b3.png
3. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.draketo.de
  counting scientific publications as metric for scientific quality is dumb | Zwillingssterns Weltenwald | 1w6
  from Arne Babenhauserheide
  So, 11/19/2017 - 11:35 — Draketo Scientific institutions1 currently base a large part of their internal evaluation, their comparison to others, and their hiring decisions on counting publication (with a number of different scorings). And this is dumb. On the surface this causes pressure to publish as many papers as possible2 which drives down quality of publications... 1w6

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice