Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://fosstodon.org/users/kernellogger/statuses/113425755681047684">Thorsten Leemhuis (acct. 1/4) (kernellogger@fosstodon.org)'s status on Wednesday, 06-Nov-2024 23:38:24 JST</a><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@kernellogger" title="kernellogger@fosstodon.org"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/109466-48-20230324184559.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Thorsten Leemhuis (acct. 1/4)" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Thorsten Leemhuis (acct. 1/4)</a><div><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@kernellogger/113423326379629922" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/101274" title="waldi@chaos.social">waldi</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p>3/ It got even stranger: it seems <a href="https://linuxrocks.online/@tuxedocomputers">@tuxedocomputers</a>  provided the wrong license to the <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/LinuxKernel" rel="tag">#LinuxKernel</a>'s MODULE_LICENSE()[1] macro either by accident or on purpose. 🧐 </p><p><a href="https://chaos.social/@waldi">@waldi</a> pointed that out earlier today elsewhere in this thread; PWM maintainer Uwe Kleine-König a little later submitted a bug report asking this to be fixed:</p><p><a href="https://gitlab.com/tuxedocomputers/development/packages/tuxedo-drivers/-/merge_requests/21" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://gitlab.com/tuxedocomputers/development/packages/tuxedo-drivers/-/merge_requests/21</a></p><p>[1] they proclaim it's GPL, which according to the <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/Linux" rel="tag">#Linux</a> <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/kernel" rel="tag">#kernel</a>'s docs means "GPLv2" (either -only or -or-later), when in fact the code is GPLv3</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3933301#notice-7715373">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-11-06T23:38:24+09:00" title="Wednesday, 06-Nov-2024 23:38:24 JST">about 6 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@kernellogger/113425755681047684" rel="external" title="Sent from fosstodon.org via ActivityPub">fosstodon.org</a></span></span><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@kernellogger/113425755681047684">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/3425030">Untitled attachment</a></label><br><a href="https://cdn.fosstodon.org/media_attachments/files/113/425/733/418/051/536/original/2e33af0a0cdb11bc.png" rel="external">https://cdn.fosstodon.org/media_attachments/files/113/425/733/418/051/536/original/2e33af0a0cdb11bc.png</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Thorsten Leemhuis (acct. 1/4) (kernellogger@fosstodon.org)'s status on Wednesday, 06-Nov-2024 23:38:24 JSTThorsten Leemhuis (acct. 1/4)
in reply to
- TUXEDO Computers
- waldi
3/ It got even stranger: it seems @tuxedocomputers provided the wrong license to the #LinuxKernel's MODULE_LICENSE()[1] macro either by accident or on purpose. 🧐
@waldi pointed that out earlier today elsewhere in this thread; PWM maintainer Uwe Kleine-König a little later submitted a bug report asking this to be fixed:
https://gitlab.com/tuxedocomputers/development/packages/tuxedo-drivers/-/merge_requests/21
[1] they proclaim it's GPL, which according to the #Linux #kernel's docs means "GPLv2" (either -only or -or-later), when in fact the code is GPLv3
In conversation6 months ago from fosstodon.orgpermalink
Attachments
1. Untitled attachment
  https://cdn.fosstodon.org/media_attachments/files/113/425/733/418/051/536/original/2e33af0a0cdb11bc.png

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice