Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.nzoss.nz/users/abartlet/statuses/113319230288113530">Andrew Bartlett (abartlet@mastodon.nzoss.nz)'s status on Thursday, 17-Oct-2024 16:33:09 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.nzoss.nz/@abartlet" title="abartlet@mastodon.nzoss.nz"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/170506-48-20230911003102.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Andrew Bartlett" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Andrew Bartlett</a><div><a href="https://mastodon.social/@publictorsten/113315998059621041" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/@publictorsten">@publictorsten</a></p><p>Also happened in Australia to an MP:<br> <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-02-01/georgie-purcell-ai-image-nine-news-apology-digital-ethics/103408440" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-02-01/georgie-purcell-ai-image-nine-news-apology-digital-ethics/103408440</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3836956#notice-7508401">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-10-17T16:33:09+09:00" title="Thursday, 17-Oct-2024 16:33:09 JST">about 4 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.nzoss.nz/@abartlet/113319230288113530" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.nzoss.nz via ActivityPub">mastodon.nzoss.nz</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.nzoss.nz/@abartlet/113319230288113530">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: live-production.wcms.abc-cdn.net.au</div><h5><a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-02-01/georgie-purcell-ai-image-nine-news-apology-digital-ethics/103408440">Is Nine's Photoshop explanation for an MP's altered image plausible? Here's what we found</a></h5><div> from <span>https://www.abc.net.au/news/mikaela-ortolan/11511666</span></div></header><div>A graphics expert says Nine News's explanation for how a digitally altered photo of Victorian Animal Rights Party MP Georgie Purcell was put to air is plausible — and raises important questions over the way the technology is used across society.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Andrew Bartlett (abartlet@mastodon.nzoss.nz)'s status on Thursday, 17-Oct-2024 16:33:09 JSTAndrew Bartlett
in reply to
- publictorsten
@publictorsten
Also happened in Australia to an MP:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-02-01/georgie-purcell-ai-image-nine-news-apology-digital-ethics/103408440
In conversationabout 4 months ago from mastodon.nzoss.nzpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: live-production.wcms.abc-cdn.net.au
  Is Nine's Photoshop explanation for an MP's altered image plausible? Here's what we found
  from https://www.abc.net.au/news/mikaela-ortolan/11511666
  A graphics expert says Nine News's explanation for how a digitally altered photo of Victorian Animal Rights Party MP Georgie Purcell was put to air is plausible — and raises important questions over the way the technology is used across society.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice