@toiletpaper There's about a dozen Russian hacking/Russian influence claims and the only one that has any validity is that at one point it appears someone connected to the russian state contacted someone in the trump campaign and offered hacked clinton campaign materials. The idiot didn't reject it and tell the FBI immediately he said he would take it to his boss but there's no indication it went anywhere, but it does look bad.

The majority of the Russian hacks that got reported relied on secret evidence that the us government refused to provide, and the claims themselves were generated by companies that are paid by the government to come to conclusions that the government wants. This is in contrast to multiple claims of Chinese hacking, claims of which are much more frequently made with public evidence. A lot of the Russian hacking attribution is ridiculously easy to fabricate, like "virus has metadata indicating it was compiled on a machine with a Russian-language locale" you're pretty fucking stupid if you don't realize every intelligence agency on the planet can trivially fake that (and every other attribution evidence)