@lanodan @lucy @zero
>that's entirely out of context.
How is it out of context ? Nintendo, buys back copyrhgt ownership, the repo/code is gone. So either they go money or nothing or they got employed.

>that's not what revocation means.
How is it not revocation if people don't have access to the code ? Which is the case with ryujinx.

>Check an Android device for the GPL in the credits.
You mean the GPLv2 loophole issue ? shame that almost all android distributors doesn't use any piece of GPLv3 code like coreutils and go with BusyBox instead.