@sicp @vulonkaaz @Suiseiseki > The CC0 license was designed to grant nearest public domain equivalence in jurisdictions that don't have an analogous concept. With public domain the Four Freedoms are neither here nor there with regards to derivative works.

One of the concerns of CC0 is that it doesn't free users from the bullshit of patent interference.

Apache license, among others, handles that.

> However "public domain" is not, which is why I said that instead.

Fair.

> As I understand it the set of Creative Commons licenses were made to cover a large area of issues, and were not intended primarily for software.

I seem to recall similarly.