Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://flyovercountry.social/users/encthenet/statuses/113219016430681630">John-Mark Gurney (encthenet@flyovercountry.social)'s status on Sunday, 29-Sep-2024 13:46:03 JST</a><a href="https://flyovercountry.social/@encthenet" title="encthenet@flyovercountry.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/74726-48-20221216183404.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="John-Mark Gurney" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">John-Mark Gurney</a><div><a href="https://flyovercountry.social/@encthenet/113219004340072514" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/257933" title="rtheren@social.linux.pizza">#/usr/sbin/rtheren</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/274913" title="feld@friedcheese.us">feld</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://friedcheese.us/users/feld">@feld</a> <a href="https://silversword.online/@darth">@darth</a> <a href="https://social.linux.pizza/@RTheren">@RTheren</a> BUT, I'm not sure that the nic can properly hash the pppoe packets to make it multithreaded.</p><p>The first step would be for someone who has a PPPoE setup w/ slow performance to generate a flame graph to help identify the parts that need work.</p><p>something like:<br><a href="https://www.brendangregg.com/blog/2015-03-10/freebsd-flame-graphs.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.brendangregg.com/blog/2015-03-10/freebsd-flame-graphs.html</a> or looking at the flame graph readme.</p><p>But specing price would be hard (or expensive) w/o understanding what likely needs work.</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3742438#notice-7332449">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-09-29T13:46:03+09:00" title="Sunday, 29-Sep-2024 13:46:03 JST">about 9 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/notice/7332449" rel="external" title="Sent from gnusocial.jp via ActivityPub">gnusocial.jp</a></span></span><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/notice/7332449">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.brendangregg.com</div><h5><a href="https://www.brendangregg.com/blog/2015-03-10/freebsd-flame-graphs.html">FreeBSD Flame Graphs</a></h5><div></div></header><div>FreeBSD Flame Graphs</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
John-Mark Gurney (encthenet@flyovercountry.social)'s status on Sunday, 29-Sep-2024 13:46:03 JSTJohn-Mark Gurney
in reply to
@feld @darth @RTheren BUT, I'm not sure that the nic can properly hash the pppoe packets to make it multithreaded.
The first step would be for someone who has a PPPoE setup w/ slow performance to generate a flame graph to help identify the parts that need work.
something like:
https://www.brendangregg.com/blog/2015-03-10/freebsd-flame-graphs.html or looking at the flame graph readme.
But specing price would be hard (or expensive) w/o understanding what likely needs work.
In conversationabout 9 months ago from gnusocial.jppermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.brendangregg.com
  FreeBSD Flame Graphs
  FreeBSD Flame Graphs

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice