@FourOh-LLC @grey @veff @vic @TatsuyaIshida >My point is that you cannot have it both ways...
I fully agree. The struggle in an "unwinnable" fight is the point. The battle is The Lord's, and we are told to fight.
>By compromising on heart-beat laws, by denying tax-funded abortions, and by cleaning up the Dictionary and separating "woman's health" from "abortion".
Seemingly pragmatic compromise is what allowed unregulated abortion functionally until two weeks after birth in some libtarded areas. It wasn't even 15 years ago that "safe, legal, and rare" was the Democrat's public opinion on abortion. Fungibility of money is abused— Planned Parenthood famously claimed that "NO TAXPAYER FUNDS ARE USED FOR ABORTION". By their same logic, the junkie begging for money is not buying drugs with the money I gave him since it's going into his left pocket (he took the $20 he already had in his left pocket and moved it to the right pocket— totally different money)! We do not have control of language in this country, and this has been abused by libtards for decades if not centuries.
>alienate Hindus, Buddhist, Jews, the atheist and the indifferent - who otherwise would agree with religion-free, purely academic arguments over the issue.
There are non-Christians who agree with the secular pro-life arguments presented in the 90s and 00s, but they're far smaller of a block than the frothing ragers that dominate NPC culture today. Look at the ubiquity of Orange Man Bad NPC type responses vs sensible disagreements and you see a similar ratio. Libtards have two-dimensional views of the world and cannot fathom the more nuanced views that democratic republics rely on. In other words: we cannot ever win by compromise, and we must hold the line knowing they'll take a mile over any inch we give.