@johnlogic @PeterBronez @patterfloof

> The US already has the rail rights-of-way it needs.

What does this mean? That we don't need any additional land? How is that possible when in some places the law requires 400ft of space around the rail?


> It also has "eminent domain" laws

Don't even. This will get wrapped up in courts for decades. We all know it, that's why it's not being used.