Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://journa.host/users/chrisgeidner/statuses/112882320736231451">Chris Geidner (chrisgeidner@journa.host)'s status on Thursday, 01-Aug-2024 09:47:29 JST</a><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner" title="chrisgeidner@journa.host"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/75697-48-20240516135537.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Chris Geidner" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Chris Geidner</a><div><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner/112879346502578829" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a></div></section><article><p>UPDATE: DOJ filed its opposition to the Eleventh Circuit request sought by Alabama et al. for an "administrative injunction" after being denied an injunction by the district court in their Title IX rule challenge. DOJ basically says, "Uh, no?" <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca11.87955/gov.uscourts.ca11.87955.13.0.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca11.87955/gov.uscourts.ca11.87955.13.0.pdf</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3457418#notice-6796126">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-08-01T09:47:29+09:00" title="Thursday, 01-Aug-2024 09:47:29 JST">about 4 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner/112882320736231451" rel="external" title="Sent from journa.host via ActivityPub">journa.host</a></span></span><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner/112882320736231451">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2983274">DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES’ OPPOSITION TO EMERGENCY
MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE INJUNCTION
The Court should deny plaintiffs’ request for an immediate “administrative
injunction” pending a ruling on their forthcoming motion for an injunction pending
appeal. For the reasons set out below, entering the requested relief would exceed the
proper bounds of this Court’s emergency, equitable authority. It would also be
profoundly inequitable to stay the implementation of numerous rule provisions—
many of which plaintiffs do not even challenge and none of which the district court
found likely to be unlawful—without affording the government a full and fair
opportunity to address plaintiffs’ arguments. Accordingly, this Court should deny
plaintiffs’ request for emergency administrative relief and allow the government the
ten days provided for in the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure—or at minimum, a
reasonable period—to respond to plaintiffs’ forthcoming motion for an injunction
pending appeal.</a></label><br><a href="https://assets.journa.host/media_attachments/files/112/882/320/516/734/543/original/593adcb84dd6f3cd.png" rel="external">https://assets.journa.host/media_attachments/files/112/882/320/516/734/543/original/593adcb84dd6f3cd.png</a></li><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2983277">Untitled attachment</a></label><br></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Chris Geidner (chrisgeidner@journa.host)'s status on Thursday, 01-Aug-2024 09:47:29 JST Chris Geidner
in reply to
UPDATE: DOJ filed its opposition to the Eleventh Circuit request sought by Alabama et al. for an "administrative injunction" after being denied an injunction by the district court in their Title IX rule challenge. DOJ basically says, "Uh, no?" https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca11.87955/gov.uscourts.ca11.87955.13.0.pdf
In conversationabout 4 months ago from journa.hostpermalink
Attachments
1. DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES’ OPPOSITION TO EMERGENCY MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE INJUNCTION The Court should deny plaintiffs’ request for an immediate “administrative injunction” pending a ruling on their forthcoming motion for an injunction pending appeal. For the reasons set out below, entering the requested relief would exceed the proper bounds of this Court’s emergency, equitable authority. It would also be profoundly inequitable to stay the implementation of numerous rule provisions— many of which plaintiffs do not even challenge and none of which the district court found likely to be unlawful—without affording the government a full and fair opportunity to address plaintiffs’ arguments. Accordingly, this Court should deny plaintiffs’ request for emergency administrative relief and allow the government the ten days provided for in the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure—or at minimum, a reasonable period—to respond to plaintiffs’ forthcoming motion for an injunction pending appeal.
  https://assets.journa.host/media_attachments/files/112/882/320/516/734/543/original/593adcb84dd6f3cd.png
2. Untitled attachment

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice