Anyway, what the combination of the Corner Post and the Chevron Deference cases really mean for the rest of us is that anyone can sue at any time for "harms" caused by government agencies (e.g. your forestry company is 'harmed' by it's inability to log due to EPA regulations) even if that regulation has been in place for decades, AND that when/if there is ANY ambiguity in the law (such as the inability to predict future technology), the courts will interpret the intent, meaning, and constitutionality of the law instead of the experts in the field familiar with the language of the particular field.