Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Jen! Please Clap (itsjennotgoblin@goblin.camp)'s status on Sunday, 28-Jul-2024 00:30:21 JST Jen! Please Clap

   in reply to

   Anyway, what the combination of the Corner Post and the Chevron Deference cases really mean for the rest of us is that anyone can sue at any time for "harms" caused by government agencies (e.g. your forestry company is 'harmed' by it's inability to log due to EPA regulations) even if that regulation has been in place for decades, AND that when/if there is ANY ambiguity in the law (such as the inability to predict future technology), the courts will interpret the intent, meaning, and constitutionality of the law instead of the experts in the field familiar with the language of the particular field.

   • Embed this notice
     Jen! Please Clap (itsjennotgoblin@goblin.camp)'s status on Sunday, 28-Jul-2024 00:30:22 JST Jen! Please Clap

     What conservative fuckhead got a hold of editorial power of SCOTUS blog?!?

     "Supreme Court strikes down Chevron, curtailing power of federal agencies"

     Is EXTREMELY a right wing headline. Federal agencies that weren't "law enforcement " based were not OUT OF CONTROL. And even if they WERE, what would that even look like?!?

     "Oh NOOOOOO, we have aggressively clean water nationwide?" "Oh nooooooooo, we aren't dumping toxic waste willy nilly into the ground next to poor people's homes?!?"

     AnthonyJK-Admin repeated this.