@quantum Yeah. Definitely not duffield, that would be a catastrophe.
I'd personally agree with her on the incongruence assessment in so far as that right now, if there is to be movement forwards around GRCs, it has to be done incrementally considering how toxic and anti-GRA reform the publics perception has become. And right now the stalemate has to be broken if the discussion is to move on.
If they can chuck the hidden panel entirely in exchange for just a diagnosis thats a significant step. I'm interested to hear the actual details on that proposal - ie if someone has a diagnosis already from over 2 years ago, what does that mean for them etc. But if its approached in good faith with an aim to actually improving trans lives it could be huge.