@sickburnbro >It's this much
>Then the panel would need X kWh. That's not that much
>It's more
how much more?

>Again, I'm not going to go into detail.
If you can't go into detail, look at the big picture (attached)
You can read from the report [1] (or one of the many similar ones) directly and find where you disagree, if you like. But I'd be interested in hard numbers. You wouldn't accept some guy arguing "nuclear has hidden costs" as a solid argument either.

[1] seas.columbia.edu/clca/Task12_LCI_LCA_10_21_Final_Report.pdf