Embed Notice

@tokyo_0 @jeffowski If we define religion as "set of beliefs", and being part of a religion as "subscribing to this particular set of beliefs", why is it then not okay for somebody to be of the opinion that that is already and generally "poison"?

You may not agree with it, but that should be ok, in the space of hypotheses, to have different opinions?

Interesting, how you introduced "sacred" into this! We could probably talk for days about what "sacred" means and implies... ;-)