Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.social/users/reedmideke/statuses/111144664210033012">Reed Mideke (reedmideke@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 12-Jun-2024 20:52:24 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/@reedmideke" title="reedmideke@mastodon.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/108668-48-20230320145057.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Reed Mideke" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Reed Mideke</a><div><a href="https://mastodon.social/@reedmideke/111122552480740710" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><p>Inspired by <a href="https://cyberplace.social/@GossiTheDog">@GossiTheDog</a> (<a href="https://mastodon.social/@GossiTheDog@cyberplace.social/111144290629997760" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://mastodon.social/@GossiTheDog@cyberplace.social/111144290629997760</a>) I asked bing chat what it knows about me. No surprise it picked twitter since I keep pretty low profile otherwise, but uh…<br>1) "He" - good guess<br>2) "has over 2,000 followers" - under 200<br>3) "joined Twitter in June 2010" - Close, Nov 2010<br>4) It cites tweets… which don't remotely say what bing claims. <br>5) In fact, it cites the same tweet [2] for two totally different topics (neither correct, though vaguely adjacent).</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3230235#notice-6377222">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-06-12T20:52:24+09:00" title="Wednesday, 12-Jun-2024 20:52:24 JST">about 6 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@reedmideke/111144664210033012" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.social via ActivityPub">mastodon.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@reedmideke/111144664210033012">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2773184">Screenshot of bing chat. The query is "Who is reed mideke'
The response says 
Searching for: reed mideke
Generating answers for you
Reed Mideke is a Twitter user who posts about various topics, such as politics, science, and history. He has over 2,000 followers and joined Twitter in June 2010. Some of his recent tweets are about a court case involving a police officer who shot a man in the back 1, the Russian satellite that collided with a Chinese satellite and created a debris cloud 2, and the anniversary of the Chernobyl disaster 2. You can find more information about him by visiting his Twitter profile 3.Learn more:
1. twitter.com
2. twitter.com
3. twitter.com
4. t.co</a></label><br><a href="https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/144/582/420/776/258/original/0eb8e431443bd0a8.png" rel="external">https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/144/582/420/776/258/original/0eb8e431443bd0a8.png</a></li><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2773185">Screenshots of two tweets in a thread, posted by me, July 28, 2022. Red text notes the second tweet is the one bing linked as "court case involving a police officer who shot a man in the back"
The first tweet says "Turns out even the 5th circuit does believe in *some* limits to QI [puke emoji]
But wait, you say, if this was an appeal, that means the trial judge…" and quotes a tweet from Law &amp; Crime @lawcrimenews which says "Fifth Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity Defense to Texas Deputy Who Allegedly Forced a Woman to Expose Herself to Him While He Masturbatedhttps://bit.ly/3S6Wp2p"
The second tweet says, quoting the story, says: "District Judge Michael Truncale, a Donald Trump appointee, granted Boyd’s motion for summary judgment… 'Deputy Boyd’s conduct does not shock the conscience for purposes of the Fourteenth Amendment'"</a></label><br><a href="https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/144/600/203/375/991/original/982b563ffb56a53b.png" rel="external">https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/144/600/203/375/991/original/982b563ffb56a53b.png</a></li><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2773186">Screenshot of a tweet I posted Aug 29, 2022. It's labeled indicating this is the two tweets bing said was about "the Russian satellite that collided with a Chinese satellite and created a debris cloud" and "the anniversary of the Chernobyl disaster"
The tweet says "Hard to overstate how horrifically irresponsible the Russians have been, but not exactly surprising from the guys who dug trenches in the red forest" and quotes a tweet from Geoff Brumfiel @gbrumfiel  which says "Wowowow... @Maxar's latest imagery of the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant has some STUFF...First of all, check out the Russian armored vehicles. They're parked like ducks in a row in front of Unit 5, under an elevated walkway used to access the reactors." and includes satellite pictures of the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant which is the topic of the thread, not either of the things bing claimed.</a></label><br><a href="https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/144/639/581/515/885/original/3d4bdf1752c727c3.png" rel="external">https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/144/639/581/515/885/original/3d4bdf1752c727c3.png</a></li><li><article><header><div>No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.</div><h5><a href="https://mastodon.social/@GossiTheDog@cyberplace.social/111144290629997760">Mastodon</a></h5><div></div></header><div></div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Reed Mideke (reedmideke@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 12-Jun-2024 20:52:24 JSTReed Mideke
in reply to
- Kevin Beaumont
Inspired by @GossiTheDog (https://mastodon.social/@GossiTheDog@cyberplace.social/111144290629997760) I asked bing chat what it knows about me. No surprise it picked twitter since I keep pretty low profile otherwise, but uh…
1) "He" - good guess
2) "has over 2,000 followers" - under 200
3) "joined Twitter in June 2010" - Close, Nov 2010
4) It cites tweets… which don't remotely say what bing claims.
5) In fact, it cites the same tweet [2] for two totally different topics (neither correct, though vaguely adjacent).
In conversationabout 6 months ago from mastodon.socialpermalink
Attachments

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice