Screenshots of two tweets in a thread, posted by me, July 28, 2022. Red text notes the second tweet is the one bing linked as "court case involving a police officer who shot a man in the back" The first tweet says "Turns out even the 5th circuit does believe in *some* limits to QI [puke emoji] But wait, you say, if this was an appeal, that means the trial judge…" and quotes a tweet from Law & Crime @lawcrimenews which says "Fifth Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity Defense to Texas Deputy Who Allegedly Forced a Woman to Expose Herself to Him While He Masturbated https://bit.ly/3S6Wp2p" The second tweet says, quoting the story, says: "District Judge Michael Truncale, a Donald Trump appointee, granted Boyd’s motion for summary judgment… 'Deputy Boyd’s conduct does not shock the conscience for purposes of the Fourteenth Amendment'"
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/144/600/203/375/991/original/982b563ffb56a53b.png