Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mstdn.social/users/rysiek/statuses/112436533148760517">Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦 (rysiek@mstdn.social)'s status on Tuesday, 14-May-2024 20:26:37 JST</a><a href="https://mstdn.social/@rysiek" title="rysiek@mstdn.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/13472-48-20221025105231.webp" width="48" height="48" alt='Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦' style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦</a></section><article><p>"ChatGPT [prompt] consumes (…) up to 25 times more than a Google search" <br><a href="https://www.brusselstimes.com/1042696/chatgpt-consumes-25-times-more-energy-than-google" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.brusselstimes.com/1042696/chatgpt-consumes-25-times-more-energy-than-google</a></p><p>&gt; Making sure your electricity comes from wind, solar or nuclear power is a logical first step. Google itself, for example, says it has been running entirely on green electricity since 2015.</p><p>Story misses a crucial point:</p><p>👉 The goal isn't just to add green power. The goal is to emit less CO2!</p><p>New green capacity needs to *replace* old dirty stuff. Not be gobbled up by new data centers for AI.</p><p>🧵</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3089343#notice-6121342">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-05-14T20:26:37+09:00" title="Tuesday, 14-May-2024 20:26:37 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mstdn.social/@rysiek/112436533148760517" rel="external" title="Sent from mstdn.social via ActivityPub">mstdn.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mstdn.social/@rysiek/112436533148760517">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: api.brusselstimes.com</div><h5><a href="https://www.brusselstimes.com/1042696/chatgpt-consumes-25-times-more-energy-than-google">ChatGPT consumes 25 times more energy than Google</a></h5><div> from <span>The Brussels Times</span></div></header><div>"The negative impact of AI needs to be mitigated. Business leaders should be aware of the growing environmental impact of AI and take action."</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦 (rysiek@mstdn.social)'s status on Tuesday, 14-May-2024 20:26:37 JST Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦
"ChatGPT [prompt] consumes (…) up to 25 times more than a Google search"
https://www.brusselstimes.com/1042696/chatgpt-consumes-25-times-more-energy-than-google
> Making sure your electricity comes from wind, solar or nuclear power is a logical first step. Google itself, for example, says it has been running entirely on green electricity since 2015.
Story misses a crucial point:
👉 The goal isn't just to add green power. The goal is to emit less CO2!
New green capacity needs to *replace* old dirty stuff. Not be gobbled up by new data centers for AI.
🧵
In conversationabout a year ago from mstdn.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: api.brusselstimes.com
  ChatGPT consumes 25 times more energy than Google
  from The Brussels Times
  "The negative impact of AI needs to be mitigated. Business leaders should be aware of the growing environmental impact of AI and take action."

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice