@jeffcliff @DutchBoomerMan @EightEight @JedDrudge @pyrate @mk @curtis Cut and paste their definition of "long covid". It most certainly is not non-ambiguous, and every ailment mentioned in the study relates to psychology, completely vague and relies solely on the "patient" discussing how they think they feel. Nothing in that study is something a doctor can run a test for to determine if the "patient" actually has "long civid", got it from the virus that causes covid (not the jab itself), and are simply not just making shit up.