Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mast.hpc.social/users/jbowen/statuses/112163960666188902">Jason Bowen (jbowen@mast.hpc.social)'s status on Saturday, 30-Mar-2024 00:40:32 JST</a><a href="https://mast.hpc.social/@jbowen" title="jbowen@mast.hpc.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/130387-48-20241109042148.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Jason Bowen" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Jason Bowen</a><div><a href="https://mastodon.online/@vwbusguy/112142766325873302" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/109920" title="mattdm@hachyderm.io">Matthew Miller</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://mastodon.online/@vwbusguy">@vwbusguy</a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/@mattdm">@mattdm</a> I pushed back against the CentOS/RHEL source stuff being a *good* example for other to emulate.</p><p>I wouldn't argue that what they did is similar to the other "business license" examples you mentioned, because it's not. RH didn't change any licenses.</p><p>No one did anything legally "wrong," and what the others did is worse than what RH did, but, IMO, they all acted in bad faith w.r.t. the FLOSS community.</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2877894#notice-5719307">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-03-30T00:40:32+09:00" title="Saturday, 30-Mar-2024 00:40:32 JST">about 8 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mast.hpc.social/@jbowen/112163960666188902" rel="external" title="Sent from mast.hpc.social via ActivityPub">mast.hpc.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mast.hpc.social/@jbowen/112163960666188902">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2435594">Untitled attachment</a></label><br></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Jason Bowen (jbowen@mast.hpc.social)'s status on Saturday, 30-Mar-2024 00:40:32 JSTJason Bowen
in reply to
- Scott Williams 🐧
- Matthew Miller
@vwbusguy @mattdm I pushed back against the CentOS/RHEL source stuff being a *good* example for other to emulate.
I wouldn't argue that what they did is similar to the other "business license" examples you mentioned, because it's not. RH didn't change any licenses.
No one did anything legally "wrong," and what the others did is worse than what RH did, but, IMO, they all acted in bad faith w.r.t. the FLOSS community.
In conversationabout 8 months ago from mast.hpc.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Untitled attachment

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice