@sapphire @TURBORETARD9000 @dassauerkraut @RehnSturm256 Oh, I see what the thrust of your argument is. Let's go ahead and circumvent that with the appropriate counterexamples.

Out of Psychology, Steven's Power Law is...both literally the only useful thing to have come out of Psychology since Jung, and a huge breakthrough in understanding how people respond to stimuli.

Most of Computer Science was developed after the transistor. Computer Science is "kind of a big deal," and most of it is independent of having actually developed a transistor (vacuum tube computers did exist).

In Mathematics...it's hard to really explain, but a lot of extremely hard problems have been solved. The Bieberbach Conjecture, Poincare Conjecture, and ABC conjecture have been settled, and those were large advancements when they happened. Multiresolution Analysis is newly developed - pure mathematicians largely don't care about it, but Engineers care about them HUGELY.

In Engineering...just in my field, there are entire disciplines which have been solved (Wavelet Analysis), Artificial Intelligence has been booming, we have started laying down fiberoptic cable so that we have actually decent communication across the internet, Solar Panels exist...

All of these things are just in fields which I'm familiar with, and I *use* some of those things on a daily basis. It's ridiculous to say that scientific development is mainly due to inertia from the pre-war period. It *is* slowing down in the US - and it is because kikes have saddled the US with too many niggers - but there are still people who can discover and create in the US (and we are preparing to leave :kekw: )