Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mitra.social/objects/018e2eb0-99d8-932d-acd3-38d19dbf3cbf">silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Mar-2024 03:06:34 JST</a><a href="https://mitra.social/users/silverpill" title="silverpill@mitra.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/85321-48-20230105202807.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="silverpill" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">silverpill</a><div><a href="https://3dp.chat/@manyfold/112078187180138804" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://3dp.chat/@manyfold">@manyfold</a> I think property-based interop is often better than type-based interop and that the former should be more popular among developers. It is easier to design new applications this way. Unfortunately, today many servers would refuse to process objects of unknown types, even if all properties needed for conversion are present. You can see how different objects are processed in this table:</p><p><a href="https://funfedi.dev/support_tables/generated/object_types/">https://funfedi.dev/support_tables/generated/object_types/</a></p><p>(made by <a href="https://mymath.rocks/timeline/">@helge</a>)</p><p>Mastodon is particularly restrictive. There's an open issue though: <a href="https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/24079">https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/24079</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2813858#notice-5583199">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-03-12T03:06:34+09:00" title="Tuesday, 12-Mar-2024 03:06:34 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mitra.social/objects/018e2eb0-99d8-932d-acd3-38d19dbf3cbf" rel="external" title="Sent from mitra.social via ActivityPub">mitra.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mitra.social/objects/018e2eb0-99d8-932d-acd3-38d19dbf3cbf">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: opengraph.githubassets.com</div><h5><a href="https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/24079">Always show object `content`, regardless of object `type`, if `mediaType` is supported · Issue #24079 · mastodon/mastodon</a></h5><div></div></header><div>Pitch Currently, Mastodon separates ActivityPub objects between “supported” and “converted”, based on object type. Converted objects will only display a title, spoiler text and URL. This is the cas...</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Mar-2024 03:06:34 JSTsilverpill
in reply to
- Manyfold
@manyfold I think property-based interop is often better than type-based interop and that the former should be more popular among developers. It is easier to design new applications this way. Unfortunately, today many servers would refuse to process objects of unknown types, even if all properties needed for conversion are present. You can see how different objects are processed in this table:
https://funfedi.dev/support_tables/generated/object_types/
(made by @helge)
Mastodon is particularly restrictive. There's an open issue though: https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/24079
In conversationabout a year ago from mitra.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: opengraph.githubassets.com
  Always show object `content`, regardless of object `type`, if `mediaType` is supported · Issue #24079 · mastodon/mastodon
  Pitch Currently, Mastodon separates ActivityPub objects between “supported” and “converted”, based on object type. Converted objects will only display a title, spoiler text and URL. This is the cas...

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice