You don't seem to understand Article III of the U.S. Constitution. A plaintiff must have standing, this means that it must have an injury in fact and the court must be capable of providing a remedy. What injury would yuzu have if a court determined that the distribution or possession of their software was illegal and someone later forked it and distributed it (I note that such a decision would be res judicata as against yuzu in any such case)? What remedy could a court provide in such a case.

I'll wait here for your cogent analysis of Article III's case or controversy analysis. SMFH. 😒