Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mstdn.social/users/mcnado/statuses/111831513667034634">McNadoMD (mcnado@mstdn.social)'s status on Sunday, 28-Jan-2024 12:46:30 JST</a><a href="https://mstdn.social/@mcnado" title="mcnado@mstdn.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/77189-48-20230330050220.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="McNadoMD" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">McNadoMD</a><div><a href="https://qoto.org/@freemo/111831494219554504" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/77540" title="raccoon@techhub.social">Raccoon at TechHub for Harris</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://qoto.org/@freemo">@freemo</a> <a href="https://techhub.social/@Raccoon">@Raccoon</a> here’s the text of the study cited by the CDC abstract. Go find that part for me in it, I’ll wait. </p><p>The CDC abstract quoted earlier, and the recent Nature review, both concluded what you reference. That, however, is not the same as telling me that the cited paper (linked below) did not show an 80% rate in the study population, which included all severities and non-hospitalized patients. </p><p><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352980/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352980/</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2643318#notice-5239797">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-01-28T12:46:30+09:00" title="Sunday, 28-Jan-2024 12:46:30 JST">about 9 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mstdn.social/@mcnado/111831513667034634" rel="external" title="Sent from mstdn.social via ActivityPub">mstdn.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mstdn.social/@mcnado/111831513667034634">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov</div><h5><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352980/">More than 50 long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis</a></h5><div></div></header><div>COVID-19 can involve persistence, sequelae, and other medical complications that last weeks to months after initial recovery. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to identify studies assessing the long-term effects of COVID-19. LitCOVID and Embase ...</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
McNadoMD (mcnado@mstdn.social)'s status on Sunday, 28-Jan-2024 12:46:30 JSTMcNadoMD
in reply to
- 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
- Raccoon at TechHub for Harris
@freemo @Raccoon here’s the text of the study cited by the CDC abstract. Go find that part for me in it, I’ll wait.
The CDC abstract quoted earlier, and the recent Nature review, both concluded what you reference. That, however, is not the same as telling me that the cited paper (linked below) did not show an 80% rate in the study population, which included all severities and non-hospitalized patients.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352980/
In conversationabout 9 months ago from mstdn.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  More than 50 long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  COVID-19 can involve persistence, sequelae, and other medical complications that last weeks to months after initial recovery. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to identify studies assessing the long-term effects of COVID-19. LitCOVID and Embase ...

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice