Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://social.coop/users/GuerillaOntologist/statuses/111823461776673181">Jzero (guerillaontologist@social.coop)'s status on Saturday, 27-Jan-2024 02:49:13 JST</a><a href="https://social.coop/@GuerillaOntologist" title="guerillaontologist@social.coop"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/48701-48-20260321022557.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Jzero" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Jzero</a><div><a href="https://mastodon.ar.al/@aral/111823414310697526" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://mastodon.ar.al/@aral">@aral</a> </p><p>Here's a little different take on number 1 from Yves at Naked Capitalism</p><p><a href="https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/01/international-court-of-justice-rules-forcefully-against-israel-in-landmark-genocide-ruling-including-restricting-military-action.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/01/international-court-of-justice-rules-forcefully-against-israel-in-landmark-genocide-ruling-including-restricting-military-action.html</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2638074#notice-5227576">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-01-27T02:49:13+09:00" title="Saturday, 27-Jan-2024 02:49:13 JST">Saturday, 27-Jan-2024 02:49:13 JST</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://social.coop/@GuerillaOntologist/111823461776673181" rel="external" title="Sent from social.coop via ActivityPub">social.coop</a></span></span><a href="https://social.coop/@GuerillaOntologist/111823461776673181">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2168913">Of critical importance, and a huge smackdown to Israel, is the Court came as close as it reasonably could to calling for a ceasefire in ruling for the provisional measure (which it devised itself) for Israel to cease military action against Palestinians as members of a protected group under the Genocide Convention.1 I had opined that the Court could not call for a ceasefire since it could not bind Hamas to comply. It would not be sound or shrewd to give Israel an easy pretext for defying the court by saying that a one-sided ceasefire would leave it defenseless. But impressively, the court went as far as it could, and way way further than I expected, in constraining Israel military operations against the Palestinian population.Experts will soon opine but I assume this would still allow Israel to pursue Hamas members if it could do so without violating the Genocide Convention. This was 15 to 2, with the only dissents Uganda and the ad hoc judge from Israel.</a></label><br><a href="https://social-coop-media.ams3.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/media_attachments/files/111/823/458/668/659/294/original/dcbf4efed40a4c8c.png" rel="external">https://social-coop-media.ams3.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/media_attachments/files/111/823/458/668/659/294/original/dcbf4efed40a4c8c.png</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Jzero (guerillaontologist@social.coop)'s status on Saturday, 27-Jan-2024 02:49:13 JSTJzero
in reply to
- Aral Balkan
@aral
Here's a little different take on number 1 from Yves at Naked Capitalism
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/01/international-court-of-justice-rules-forcefully-against-israel-in-landmark-genocide-ruling-including-restricting-military-action.html
In conversationSaturday, 27-Jan-2024 02:49:13 JST from social.cooppermalink
Attachments
1. Of critical importance, and a huge smackdown to Israel, is the Court came as close as it reasonably could to calling for a ceasefire in ruling for the provisional measure (which it devised itself) for Israel to cease military action against Palestinians as members of a protected group under the Genocide Convention.1 I had opined that the Court could not call for a ceasefire since it could not bind Hamas to comply. It would not be sound or shrewd to give Israel an easy pretext for defying the court by saying that a one-sided ceasefire would leave it defenseless. But impressively, the court went as far as it could, and way way further than I expected, in constraining Israel military operations against the Palestinian population. Experts will soon opine but I assume this would still allow Israel to pursue Hamas members if it could do so without violating the Genocide Convention. This was 15 to 2, with the only dissents Uganda and the ad hoc judge from Israel.
  https://social-coop-media.ams3.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/media_attachments/files/111/823/458/668/659/294/original/dcbf4efed40a4c8c.png

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice