@DarkMahesvara @lina @mint @Azur_Fenix @Moto_Chagatai

> few post before it was days after.
I'm talking about this portions [picrelated].

> either way why would you assume someone who hacked someone would say the truth about that person.
It is generally more effective to expose an actual dirty secret than fabricate one and risk being caught, loosing entire retrospective credibility. Since credibility attribution is rather strong here (not exactly anonymous), we can at least take into account the levels of bluff required when making a judgement.