Embed Notice

@phiofx
Yes and in the other direction, it misattributes how governance systems do work under normal conditions. Laws arent real, people break laws all day long. the thing that is real is our belief that a system does or should behave in a way. If you cant reason about a system or understand how it will behave - and algorithmic governance only makes sense at a point where one cannot trivially derive expected behavior, or else the algorithm is unnecessary - then why would you pay attention to the system?

It ceases to be a governance system and becomes a religion in the nominal case, and a really shitty religion at that