Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://chaos.social/users/scy/statuses/111711958492655905">scy (scy@chaos.social)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Jan-2024 03:59:48 JST</a><a href="https://chaos.social/@scy" title="scy@chaos.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/11435-48-20230506144638.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="scy" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">scy</a><div><a href="https://chaos.social/@scy/111711911176276377" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a></div></section><article><p>Another interesting change: He added a warning about possibly locking the thread due to "inflammatory language".</p><p>This warning was added 9 hours ago. The thread has already been locked for four days now. Vlad, what exactly are you trying to do here? Do you really think nobody is going to notice?</p><p>This just looks scummy.</p><p><a href="https://chaos.social/tags/Kagi" rel="tag">#Kagi</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2547667#notice-5068362">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-01-09T03:59:48+09:00" title="Tuesday, 09-Jan-2024 03:59:48 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://chaos.social/@scy/111711958492655905" rel="external" title="Sent from chaos.social via ActivityPub">chaos.social</a></span></span><a href="https://chaos.social/@scy/111711958492655905">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2083506">I do not see any attempts of cancel culture. I see our users using their legitimate right to express their concerns. We are here for them, and we will listen and discuss, becuse we run a customer-centric company and this is why this forum exists. We personally addressed every single of 2,500 posts on this forum and we will do the same here.I would strongly suggest keeping things on topic - does inclusion of Brave results make the quality of overall Kagi search results worse or it does opposite? And when I say customer-centric this is what I mean, because providing the best search in the world is what people pay us to do.Everything else, especially politics, is something I am afraid I wll not be engaging with in my professional capacity. This is the only principled position that I can see, as everything else would lead down the rabbit hole which would inevitably lead Kagi to undesired place in the future. We are and want to be strictly only in the business of search.Therefore I see this as a uniquely worded bug report and I am trying to figure out is it valid or not in the context of search service that we provide.</a></label><br><a href="https://assets.chaos.social/media_attachments/files/111/711/939/455/768/833/original/acdae5f2d027d868.png" rel="external">https://assets.chaos.social/media_attachments/files/111/711/939/455/768/833/original/acdae5f2d027d868.png</a></li><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2083507">Please watch the language and refrain from using inflammatory language as I'd be forced to lock this discussion (it is already going way off the rails).I do not see any attempts of cancel culture. I see our users using their legitimate right to express their concerns. We are here for them, and we will listen and discuss, becuse we run a customer-centric company and this is why this forum exists. We personally addressed every single of 2,500 posts on this forum and we will do the same here.I would strongly suggest keeping things on topic - does inclusion of Brave results make the quality of overall Kagi search results worse or it does opposite? And when I say customer-centric this is what I mean, because providing the best search in the world is what people pay us to do.Everything else, especially politics, is something I am afraid I wll not be engaging with in my professional capacity. This is the only principled position that I can see, as everything else would lead down the rabbit hole which would inevitably lead Kagi to undesired place in the future. We are and want to be strictly only in the business of search.Therefore I see this as a uniquely worded bug report and I am trying to figure out is it valid or not in the context of search service that we provide.</a></label><br><a href="https://assets.chaos.social/media_attachments/files/111/711/941/695/510/029/original/a6f5016ef48bfeac.png" rel="external">https://assets.chaos.social/media_attachments/files/111/711/941/695/510/029/original/a6f5016ef48bfeac.png</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
scy (scy@chaos.social)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Jan-2024 03:59:48 JST scy
in reply to
Another interesting change: He added a warning about possibly locking the thread due to "inflammatory language".
This warning was added 9 hours ago. The thread has already been locked for four days now. Vlad, what exactly are you trying to do here? Do you really think nobody is going to notice?
This just looks scummy.
#Kagi
In conversationabout a year ago from chaos.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. I do not see any attempts of cancel culture. I see our users using their legitimate right to express their concerns. We are here for them, and we will listen and discuss, becuse we run a customer-centric company and this is why this forum exists. We personally addressed every single of 2,500 posts on this forum and we will do the same here. I would strongly suggest keeping things on topic - does inclusion of Brave results make the quality of overall Kagi search results worse or it does opposite? And when I say customer-centric this is what I mean, because providing the best search in the world is what people pay us to do. Everything else, especially politics, is something I am afraid I wll not be engaging with in my professional capacity. This is the only principled position that I can see, as everything else would lead down the rabbit hole which would inevitably lead Kagi to undesired place in the future. We are and want to be strictly only in the business of search. Therefore I see this as a uniquely worded bug report and I am trying to figure out is it valid or not in the context of search service that we provide.
  https://assets.chaos.social/media_attachments/files/111/711/939/455/768/833/original/acdae5f2d027d868.png
2. Please watch the language and refrain from using inflammatory language as I'd be forced to lock this discussion (it is already going way off the rails). I do not see any attempts of cancel culture. I see our users using their legitimate right to express their concerns. We are here for them, and we will listen and discuss, becuse we run a customer-centric company and this is why this forum exists. We personally addressed every single of 2,500 posts on this forum and we will do the same here. I would strongly suggest keeping things on topic - does inclusion of Brave results make the quality of overall Kagi search results worse or it does opposite? And when I say customer-centric this is what I mean, because providing the best search in the world is what people pay us to do. Everything else, especially politics, is something I am afraid I wll not be engaging with in my professional capacity. This is the only principled position that I can see, as everything else would lead down the rabbit hole which would inevitably lead Kagi to undesired place in the future. We are and want to be strictly only in the business of search. Therefore I see this as a uniquely worded bug report and I am trying to figure out is it valid or not in the context of search service that we provide.
  https://assets.chaos.social/media_attachments/files/111/711/941/695/510/029/original/a6f5016ef48bfeac.png

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice