Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.social/users/danielbowen/statuses/111685117821894680">Daniel Bowen (danielbowen@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 02-Jan-2024 19:09:35 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/@danielbowen" title="danielbowen@mastodon.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/223624-48-20231216061458.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Daniel Bowen" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Daniel Bowen</a><div><a href="https://aus.social/@ajsadauskas/111685090913892156" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/101928" title="drahardja@sfba.social">Dave Rahardja (he/him)</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://aus.social/@ajsadauskas">@ajsadauskas</a> <a href="https://sfba.social/@drahardja">@drahardja</a> The idea that it wasn't a real problem is infuriating to those who worked on it.<br>It's also a myth that nothing went wrong. Some bugs slipped through, and (mostly minor) issues did occur in 2000.<br>This article has some examples - and I know I received a bill that said payment was due on 3rd March 1900.<br><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/585013.stm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/585013.stm</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2530438#notice-5010411">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-01-02T19:09:35+09:00" title="Tuesday, 02-Jan-2024 19:09:35 JST">about 10 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@danielbowen/111685117821894680" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.social via ActivityPub">mastodon.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@danielbowen/111685117821894680">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: news.bbc.co.uk</div><h5><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/585013.stm">BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Y2K bug fails to bite</a></h5><div></div></header><div>The world has welcomed the new millennium without suffering any major millennium bug problems - at least so far.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Daniel Bowen (danielbowen@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 02-Jan-2024 19:09:35 JSTDaniel Bowen
in reply to
- AJ Sadauskas
- Dave Rahardja (he/him)
@ajsadauskas @drahardja The idea that it wasn't a real problem is infuriating to those who worked on it.
It's also a myth that nothing went wrong. Some bugs slipped through, and (mostly minor) issues did occur in 2000.
This article has some examples - and I know I received a bill that said payment was due on 3rd March 1900.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/585013.stm
In conversationabout 10 months ago from mastodon.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: news.bbc.co.uk
  BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Y2K bug fails to bite
  The world has welcomed the new millennium without suffering any major millennium bug problems - at least so far.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice