Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://fosstodon.org/users/Brendanjones/statuses/111632313761029704">Brendan Jones (brendanjones@fosstodon.org)'s status on Sunday, 24-Dec-2023 08:25:30 JST</a><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@Brendanjones" title="brendanjones@fosstodon.org"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/17320-48-20221105142036.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Brendan Jones" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Brendan Jones</a><div><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@Brendanjones/111632291638315561" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://thecanadian.social/@mike">@mike</a> Don't get me wrong, this is not a rejection of your ideas;<br>I appreciate your vision of connected communities, especially:  <a href="https://thecanadian.social/@mike/111630970657018194" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://thecanadian.social/@mike/111630970657018194</a></p><p>I guess I'm concerned that changing from the technically correct term to a term that describes one social paradigm of server usage could cause unnecessary confusion?</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2490153#notice-4931439">In conversation</a><time datetime="2023-12-24T08:25:30+09:00" title="Sunday, 24-Dec-2023 08:25:30 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@Brendanjones/111632313761029704" rel="external" title="Sent from fosstodon.org via ActivityPub">fosstodon.org</a></span></span><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@Brendanjones/111632313761029704">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.</div><h5><a href="https://thecanadian.social/@mike/111630970657018194I">Mike Fraser :Jets: :flag: (@mike@thecanadian.social)</a></h5><div> from <span>Mike Fraser :Jets: :flag:</span></div></header><div>In the federated microblogging world, I think we have a choice. Do we want to be a Twitter clone with volunteer run access nodes (glorified load balancers). Or do we want to be something more, a collection of vibrant communities bridged to each other through the fediverse. There is an opportunity here to not just build something better but be something better. Building a node is easy. Building a community is harder.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Brendan Jones (brendanjones@fosstodon.org)'s status on Sunday, 24-Dec-2023 08:25:30 JSTBrendan Jones
in reply to
- Mike Fraser :Jets:
@mike Don't get me wrong, this is not a rejection of your ideas;
I appreciate your vision of connected communities, especially: https://thecanadian.social/@mike/111630970657018194
I guess I'm concerned that changing from the technically correct term to a term that describes one social paradigm of server usage could cause unnecessary confusion?
In conversationabout a year ago from fosstodon.orgpermalink
Attachments
1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
  Mike Fraser :Jets: :flag: (@mike@thecanadian.social)
  from Mike Fraser :Jets: :flag:
  In the federated microblogging world, I think we have a choice. Do we want to be a Twitter clone with volunteer run access nodes (glorified load balancers). Or do we want to be something more, a collection of vibrant communities bridged to each other through the fediverse. There is an opportunity here to not just build something better but be something better. Building a node is easy. Building a community is harder.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice