Embed Notice

@Vincarsi If that was a universal definition I would agree. As I shared earlier the definitions from advocacy groups have clearly stated Queer does not have a shared definition and that members of the community define it in contradictory ways at times.

Ergo it has no utility as it doesnt have a consistent and useful definition.

For example many of the community feel Queer is an offensive term, others do not. That discrepancy alone is a good enough reason to seek a more neutral and descriptive term.