@DryBird227 @silvereagle
With everything i know at the moment, the phrase is for absolute certainty not used "To attempt to gain advantage in an election by pandering to the electorate's racism" instead Ro is clearly accused of gaining an advantage by drawing attention to his own race.
So yes, so the explanation of this phrase is correct, but without one slight proof that it is used in the same way as 60-70 years ago it happened in the UK or in other words to Ro's disadvantage, the whole phrase is by definition a callout and not racism itself.

> Further. It's much larger than if ro was setting someone up or not.
No, as you actually posted, you cant just redefine language to something different, therefore i disagree on you with that.

> Heres something you can do. If you want. Find as many black people online as you can. And ask them. Have they ever been accused of playing the race card/black card. Then ask them after that. Do they feel they gained any advantages after pointing out racism/a racist. With said advantages not having anything to do with equality. My guess? A good 90 95% of black people you ask will say they have been accused of it. And no they didn't get any advantages after doing so. In fact, they were generally ignored/dismissed after. Which is exactly what so many are doing to ro.

You know what? Yes i know that your described situation would apply to 90-95% but still there you go, one does need the full context, to decide if Ro falls under those 90-95% or to those 5-10% and you know what?
To all my available Information & my own encounter he falls under those 5-10% so i rather ask you again as i did before, please show me the full context of your screenshot so that we both can verify what the situation here is about.