@dragestil @cmeier @amszmidt @galdor Same line of argument, still against freedom rule 0. What you say is that when it is in the interest of GNU/Emacs (publicity) it is ok to let it run in a user-harming environment, but when it is about user interests, it is not ok.
That logic really escapes my understanding of free software. There is literally no other GNU component that blocks the user from installing non-free extensions by design.