Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://minidisc.tokyo/notes/9kzygonjsg">SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Thursday, 19-Oct-2023 08:35:30 JST</a><a href="https://minidisc.tokyo/@SuperDicq" title="superdicq@minidisc.tokyo"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/theme/gnusocialjp/default-avatar-stream.png" width="48" height="48" alt="SuperDicq" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">SuperDicq</a><div><a href="https://larkspur.one/objects/565b8752-8bb7-48c0-be63-99470a2950c3" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://larkspur.one/users/cnx">@cnx@larkspur.one</a> I really like the work he does lobbying for right to repair and such, but maybe he should just stay in his lane and keep doing that.<br><br>But when it comes to ethical software development he is probably out of place. Calling this software "open source" is not an opinion, it is clearly wrong.<br><br>Literally every definition from the OSI, the FSF, the Debian project, Software Freedom Conservancy, the Wikipedia Foundation, the actual Wikipedia article on Open Source Licenses, the European Union as a whole and everyone else qualified to talk about this disagrees with Louis' definition of "open source".</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2201253#notice-4332579">In conversation</a><time datetime="2023-10-19T08:35:30+09:00" title="Thursday, 19-Oct-2023 08:35:30 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/notice/4332579" rel="external" title="Sent from gnusocial.jp via ActivityPub">gnusocial.jp</a></span></span><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/notice/4332579">permalink</a></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Thursday, 19-Oct-2023 08:35:30 JSTSuperDicq
in reply to
- McSinyx
@cnx@larkspur.one I really like the work he does lobbying for right to repair and such, but maybe he should just stay in his lane and keep doing that.

But when it comes to ethical software development he is probably out of place. Calling this software "open source" is not an opinion, it is clearly wrong.

Literally every definition from the OSI, the FSF, the Debian project, Software Freedom Conservancy, the Wikipedia Foundation, the actual Wikipedia article on Open Source Licenses, the European Union as a whole and everyone else qualified to talk about this disagrees with Louis' definition of "open source".
In conversationabout a year ago from gnusocial.jppermalink

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice