Embed Notice

@cnx@larkspur.one I really like the work he does lobbying for right to repair and such, but maybe he should just stay in his lane and keep doing that.

But when it comes to ethical software development he is probably out of place. Calling this software "open source" is not an opinion, it is clearly wrong.

Literally every definition from the OSI, the FSF, the Debian project, Software Freedom Conservancy, the Wikipedia Foundation, the actual Wikipedia article on Open Source Licenses, the European Union as a whole and everyone else qualified to talk about this disagrees with Louis' definition of "open source".