I am that alex oliva, but I don't identify myself as the source for various of the allegations that you attempt to associate with me, such as:
- that I'm not at home, or that i'm drunk :-)
- that moglen can blackmail employees
- that anyone protesting that is some kind of demon
- that everything mjg59 does is automatically wrong
- that anything but a conviction in a court of law would be meaningless
- that testimony is some kind of wrongdoing
- that you know how "my" biases and "rules" play out (I haven't stated them, have I?)
- that I prescribe social standard apartheid
- that I entitle luminaries to accuse and abuse
- that critiquing them gets one chastised (by whom?) for poking fun at [alleged] double standards
- that I appeal for others to wait for facts to come in, but don't offer that to others
none of these allegations follow from anything I wrote or think (for most of them, their opposite does), they all seem to be pure speculation and strawman building. of course if you try to substantiate what led you to those wildly wrong guesses, you'll realize they aren't supported by anything I actually wrote, and whatever remains will certainly be a result of taking something I actually wrote as meaning something entirely different from what I intended, interpreting things and filling in blanks with disfavorable assumptions. it would be useful if you gave that a try so that we could dispel those misguided assumptions