you seem to have made up more than enough to create a picture in which you feel entitled to attach an accusation of promoting apartheid to the strawman, just because I don't take an unsupported allegation as unquestionable truth, when the parties are knowingly involved in a dispute.
surely if someone were to accuse you of something (hopefully) absurd but as outrageous as genocide, without presenting any evidence, you'd not want me to take that allegation as true, would you? how's that unlike what you seem to be expecting of me WRT any other unsupported accusation?