Victor Gijsbers@anarchopunk_girl This is a possibly naive question, because I have not read Stirner. (This is Stirner, right?) I get the claim that there is no command to love. But the last sentence gets pretty close to endorsing a universality of love not as a commandment, but as an ontological fact. If I love universally, and if love involves identity, then the universe is, in some sense, universal love; reality is love. Pretty platonic, and it's unclear where the ego has gone. How should I see this?
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.