Here is the fatal flaw in his argument: He claims that anything he does as president falls within the outer perimeter of his duties.
Also, he is quoting from an amicus brief. (Screenshot #1)
I found the brief he is quoting. You can see the original brief he is citing in screenshots #2 and #3.
Well, goodness. The brief he is citing says the language of incitement is not part of a president's duties.
The main point: An amicus brief is not law. It isn't authority for anything.
9/