> the stuff that object is made of can still decay.

This presumes time. It's not an argument.


> Also a single object in it's own universe with no velocity is not at all comparable to our universe which is not static, constantly expanding, and as a result all objects are moving as they fall through space in orbit with common centers of mass.

This also presumes time. It is also not an argument. It's a tautology. What you're saying is "time is a dimension of the universe," but using different words. Black science man would be proud.