Embed Notice

@DryBird227 @freakazoid

I'm sorry something about your explanation here is very difficult for me to grasp rn but I think I have an intuitive leap of what you're saying so is it ok if I clarify in my own words to make sure I'm right?

You're referring to the fact that the guy Ro got mad at said the racism didn't exist right? So you're pointing out that I'm making a sort of circular argument here, bc what that person said was only sufficiently inoffensive if and only if we (and they) *already know* that the racism didn't exist, so it doesn't work as an existence proof to get the rest of the argument running?

Sorry I'm using this jargon, it's just what's making sense to me rn