Embed Notice

@GottaLaff Meadows' motion cites Nadler vs Mann for the claim that the entire case should be removed if any part of it is based upon federal employment - sounds pretty slam dunk against GA...

... Until you read the case, which (1) is civil under the FTCA where the Feds already certified the employee was within the scope of duties, and (2) the court held that the district court had discretion whether to remand the non-duty related claim back to the state - Meadows' brief is misleading.