Embed Notice
HTML Code
Corresponding Notice
- Embed this notice@JAJAX @tyler @paula @Ottovonshitpost @Shadowman311 I'd say it is. Only two, but really one of you believe the association between Daniel and Babylon, religious origins that don't involve some group of gods battling it out to create nature and shape existence—Christianity and Zoroastrianism. The foundation of Christianity is a good set of rules from a moral perspective that encourages prosocial behaviors. Godcast has said it right that "Christianity is a fluid that will shape to the culture it encounters" (paraphrasing), and I think that's true. Europeans undeniably had a better historical ground in place and the right genetic stock to become the dominant civilization, but I think it's foolish to discount Christianity. And that's me being purely practical and not "religious". I have been in too many hellthreads lately on the subject, so I need to chill.