Okay, that’s fine. The exchange ends here, then. Let’s do a recap: rdr attempted to argue that Joseph Smith couldn’t possibly be a legitimate prophet because he was a polygamist who married other men’s wives and married young girls, and that Mormonism is uniquely ridiculous for this reason. As it turns out, King David did all of that and is still canonically considered a prophet.
When confronted with the reality that this argument didn’t wash, you deliberately took one of the things I said out of context in an attempt to change the topic to the Book of Abraham. You were given the opportunity to admit that the first attempt was a failure, but instead chose to concede the Book of Abraham point as a meritless shifting of the goalposts.