Embed Notice

There’s a difference between not allowing discussion or advocation of political extremism in public communities versus in society at large. People should be able to have an opinion and express it, no matter how backward those opinions might be.

That said, public communities run by individuals often for free don’t have to tolerate those opinions and can manage their communities at their own discretion. Whether they do so equitably or become yet another echo chamber is their prerogative @sjw.

Precisely, which is what radicalism is. I don’t really think that radicalism has any place in modern society, though people should still be free to hold and express those opinions all the same. That doesn’t mean they won’t have freedom of reach or freedom from consequence when people around them begin to disassociate from those holding said opinions. Anything short of criminal activity or organized and pre-meditated harassment is acceptable as far as I’m concerned @grillchen.

It is worth stressing though that modern-day liberalism isn’t the same as classic liberalism or libertarianism. One is full of SJWs and screechers while the other wants to preserve the civil liberties of everyone. Limiting the control and authority of a government and ensuring everyone irrespective of their walk in life can have access to the same opportunity as anyone else.