@erincandescent @rysertio @lanodan @tek > only for it to promptly be seized because their counterparty was a fraudster and the funds were a proceed of crime (that they just helped money launder)
Isn't that mainly a problem for those that provide no anonymization whatsoever (which yes is most of them save for like... 3 privacy coins)?
Embed Notice
HTML Code
Corresponding Notice
- Embed this notice
LisPi (lispi314@mastodon.top)'s status on Friday, 11-Aug-2023 09:30:50 JSTLisPi