Embed Notice

Scan the article with that list in mind: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/jul/31/chatgpt-better-than-undergraduates-at-solving-sat-problems-study-suggests

Are the findings consistent or inconsistent with those casual hypotheses?

What if we reject the article’s “intelligence” framing, and instead view the study as •testing• those hypotheses above? In what ways is it or is it not a good test of them?

What do the study’s results really tell us?

5/