Scan the article with that list in mind: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/jul/31/chatgpt-better-than-undergraduates-at-solving-sat-problems-study-suggests
Are the findings consistent or inconsistent with those casual hypotheses?
What if we reject the article’s “intelligence” framing, and instead view the study as •testing• those hypotheses above? In what ways is it or is it not a good test of them?
What do the study’s results really tell us?
5/
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.