@RyokoPilled @Zettour @coolboymew ive played it multiple times, you can read my posts ITT or just ask me instead of insinuating. the picture is from howlongtobeat.com which is what OP is as well.
it may be surprising to you, that some people just play a game once to experience the story and the main content, and then go on to play a different game. a major criticism of MGS4, both when it came out and as it is mentioned today, is that the cutscenes are too long. i used MGS4 as a benchmark to compare against the OP image criticizing Final Fantasy XVI (that's roman numerals for 16 btw) which also used howlongtobeat.com and a youtube video of cutscenes to compute an actual gameplay time. using MGS4 as an example was especially striking given the ratio of gameplay to cutscene on a casual first time playthrough being more than that of Final Fantasy XVI (that's roman numerals for 16 btw). the ratio of gameplay to cutscene means that there is more gameplay than cutscene, which would mean that the time you spend on a first time casual playthrough of MGS4 has more gameplay than the time you spend on a first time casual playthrough of Final Fantasy XVI (that's roman numerals for 16 btw (because X stands for 10 (and V stands for 5 (and I stands for 1 (so you add 10 and 5 and 1 (adding is a mathematical process where you increment the number by another number (so 5 plus 1 would equal 6 (and then 10 plus 6 would equal 16 (therefore X + V + I would equal 16 within the roman numeral system of numbers)))))))))