Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://masto.ai/users/stavvers/statuses/110660821418704783">Another Angry Woman (stavvers@masto.ai)'s status on Wednesday, 05-Jul-2023 20:27:12 JST</a><a href="https://masto.ai/@stavvers" title="stavvers@masto.ai"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/41495-48-20221127202416.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Another Angry Woman" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Another Angry Woman</a></section><article><p>Favourite detail so far, on the ~real-time hull monitoring system~</p><p>"We didn’t know what it would sound like if something went wrong.”</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/1736625#notice-3411874">In conversation</a><time datetime="2023-07-05T20:27:12+09:00" title="Wednesday, 05-Jul-2023 20:27:12 JST">Wednesday, 05-Jul-2023 20:27:12 JST</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://masto.ai/@stavvers/110660821418704783" rel="external" title="Sent from masto.ai via ActivityPub">masto.ai</a></span></span><a href="https://masto.ai/@stavvers/110660821418704783">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/1209789">Rush was furious; he called a meeting that afternoon, and recorded it on his phone. For the next two hours, the OceanGate leadership insisted that no hull testing was necessary—an acoustic monitoring system, to detect fraying fibres, would serve in its place. According to the company, the system would alert the pilot to the possibility of catastrophic failure “with enough time to arrest the descent and safely return to surface.” But, in a court filing, Lochridge’s lawyer wrote, “this type of acoustic analysis would only show when a component is about to fail—often milliseconds before an implosion—and would not detect any existing flaws prior to putting pressure onto the hull.” A former senior employee who was present at the meeting told me, “We didn’t even have a baseline. We didn’t know what it would sound like if something went wrong.”</a></label><br><a href="https://s3.masto.ai/media_attachments/files/110/660/820/342/566/462/original/3a66a50bd774ff3c.png" rel="external">https://s3.masto.ai/media_attachments/files/110/660/820/342/566/462/original/3a66a50bd774ff3c.png</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Another Angry Woman (stavvers@masto.ai)'s status on Wednesday, 05-Jul-2023 20:27:12 JST Another Angry Woman
Favourite detail so far, on the ~real-time hull monitoring system~
"We didn’t know what it would sound like if something went wrong.”
In conversationWednesday, 05-Jul-2023 20:27:12 JST from masto.aipermalink
Attachments
1. Rush was furious; he called a meeting that afternoon, and recorded it on his phone. For the next two hours, the OceanGate leadership insisted that no hull testing was necessary—an acoustic monitoring system, to detect fraying fibres, would serve in its place. According to the company, the system would alert the pilot to the possibility of catastrophic failure “with enough time to arrest the descent and safely return to surface.” But, in a court filing, Lochridge’s lawyer wrote, “this type of acoustic analysis would only show when a component is about to fail—often milliseconds before an implosion—and would not detect any existing flaws prior to putting pressure onto the hull.” A former senior employee who was present at the meeting told me, “We didn’t even have a baseline. We didn’t know what it would sound like if something went wrong.”
  https://s3.masto.ai/media_attachments/files/110/660/820/342/566/462/original/3a66a50bd774ff3c.png

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice