@jeffcliff @MercuryAscent @ChristiJunior @Nou The distinction between supporting some of these and outright supporting overt sexual grooming becomes rather meaningless when we look at the issue in a simpler way. Simply bringing up the concept of sex to young children is grooming. If "Erectile Dysfunction Month" occured every September and all the media and schools and corporations suddenly were obsessing over it, reasonable people would also be appalled. The supporters of ED month would say "It's not about sex, it's about ED awareness and acceptance", yet any young child continually bombarded with examples and education of the term ED is going to ask questions which force, at best, a sexually adjacent conversation. This isn't "how do I explain this to my kids", but rather "why should my kids lose their innocence and be groomed by strangers in the process". What becomes worse is the typical comorbidies associated with LGBTQ+ people that make people seriously question why they have to be near kids. It's the pitbull situation almost. Not every pitbull will bite every child, but why risk it when we see what they do and how frequently it occurs?